Usamos cookies para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação. Ao clicar em "Aceitar", você concorda com o uso de cookies.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
No cookies to display.
The present article aims to elaborate an analysis on the constitutional consonance of monocratic decisions of the Judiciary Power that have received harsh criticism and generated a serious crisis in the autonomy of the other powers. Through extensive and rich review of bibliographic literature, the study addressed three distinct segments related to the institutionalized crisis among the three Powers of the Republic. Firstly, the theoretical framework expressed in the 1988 Constitution was dealt with, which emphatically shows the areas of action and competence of the powers: Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary. Secondly, arbitrary decisions of the Judiciary Power, politicization of the judiciary, and judicial activism were discussed. And in the third segment, the impacts of this institutional crisis on Democracy and the legal insecurity provoked in Brazilian society were addressed.Keywords: Democracy.Constitution. Crisis. Autonomy.1INTRODUÇÃONo trabalho “O Espírito das Leis” de Montesquieu, foram introduzidas as cartas políticas e a forma de governo adotada por várias nações, conhecida como Teoria da Separação de Poderes. Esta teoria advoga que o governo de uma nação não pode permanecer 1Graduado em Letras –Habilitação em Português/Inglês e suas respectivas literaturas pela Faculdade de Ciências Humanas do Sertão Central -FACHUSC (2006). Pós-Graduado em Direito Tributário pela UCAM Universidade Cândido Mendes (2018). Mestrando em Ciências Jurídicas pela Veni Creator Christian University (2023).
Author: Ednaldo Francisco da Silva