Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

View all

Influence Strategy and Modus Operandi: Analysis of the JBS and Odebrecht Cases

Authors: Rui Fernando Correia Ferreira, Felipe Fróes Couto and Bruno de Almeida Vilela

Abstract: The objective of this article was to analyze the modus operandi of influence strategy employed by JBS and Odebrecht to gain a competitive advantage in their relationship with the State. This work proposes an advancement in the theoretical understanding of “influence strategy” by differentiating it from the generic concept of “non-market strategy,” emphasizing the active and intentional role of corporations in influencing decision-making processes for regulatory and legislative benefits. The modus operandi of campaign contributions, lobbying, partisan platforms, and corruption is demonstrated. Content analysis was used to examine over 35 hours of video with 27 executives from the respective companies. The study revealed that JBS and Odebrecht developed sophisticated methods of political influence to manipulate political decisions and favor their commercial interests. This allowed the identification of a complex web of interactions and influences that these corporations exert on politics and governance.

Source: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/files-articulos/PaPo/29(2024)/6812641012/index.html

Income Protection for Vulnerable Groups During the Pandemic in Brazil and Chile: The Relevance of Policy Trajectories and Governance Arrangements
January 6, 2025
A brief analysis of the Ombro a Ombro Periodical at the beginning of the New Republic
February 3, 2025