Usamos cookies para aprimorar sua experiência de navegação. Ao clicar em "Aceitar", você concorda com o uso de cookies.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
No cookies to display.
The current study means to carry out a critical analysis of the Law nº
13.165/2015 which recreated the printed vote in Brazil, from the
perspective of the Federal Supreme Court’s decision rendered in
the Direct Action for Unconstitutionality nº 4.345. To accomplish the
proposed objective it will be started from the analysis of the Ministers
Cármem Lúcia (reporter) and Gilmar Mendes’ votes, which, although
agreed in merit, diverged on the arguments utilized to recognize the
unconstitutionality of the norm. Therefore, the true macula of the norm
derives from the possibility of breach in the vote’s confidentiality and
creation of unwanted distinction among the voters on the exercise of
suffrage. Likewise, it is not acceptable the principle of interdiction of
retrocession to be drawn back of the constitutionality control process
on the grounds that it turns out to elevate infra-constitutional norms to
the constitutional dignity.
Author: VOLGANE OLIVEIRA CARVALHO
Source: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/65285089/inconvenientes_voto_impresso-libre.pdf?1609197710=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DDos_inconvenientes_do_voto_impresso_memo.pdf&Expires=1741368321&Signature=VzAWaB4DUMyHky39N8oH7Ba~xW0ai5GoyfON82o7fcGmgHChDcjfDiRlNGsx5O6pYC6ruv5tbi8updBP0ZnrmCBoMFQubHkFeyjWpEHpzSiaCgPtyjs7HglPLLtXjbXwtMmgDUtR~66aFAC0UVVDHB1vIPlOJyKAdgGyGyj–G2qPArbN4lzWdO6lCJ-re8zZbl43Ux5sdvfVF3VT-ZXDrWhOvW6KnY2s-PlAytLMSw5xNhWSPgcqRuct~tJ97BaPiHiW8FJfWHvgbW-iIUL9t-bHGSEHalAms2y8VXOm7tu457qIu1wb3i7~yDImmbYbLEJMQSAHysPKCZ9~uOGzw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA